Case Study – RightStart™ Car-T (Oncology)

Company: $2B+ in Revenue
Therapeutic Area: Car-T (Oncology)
NEED
Gaps in community oncologists’ understanding of:
- CAR-T therapy in general
- Differences between current CAR-T therapies
- Ideal patients for CAR-T therapy
- The process to refer patients for CAR-T therapy
- Their role and responsibilities during and after CAR-T therapy is started
This lack of awareness and comfort directly impacts community oncologists’ ability to refer appropriate patients to authorized treatment centers.
SOLUTION
Gaps in community oncologists’ understanding of:
- Clinical credibility
- An ability to relate given experience in similar roles
- Proficiency to engage in relevant peer-to-peer discussions
- Increased time with HCPs and higher level of receptivity
– On average, VMS Oncology Nurse Educators interact with 7.2 oncology HCPs/day vs. oncology sales rep average of 2.3/day - The ability to easily integrate with existing field teams while also filling an educational role
NEED
Gaps in community oncologists’ understanding of:
- CAR-T therapy in general
- Differences between current CAR-T therapies
- Ideal patients for CAR-T therapy
- The process to refer patients for CAR-T therapy
- Their role and responsibilities during and after CAR-T therapy is started
This lack of awareness and comfort directly impacts community oncologists’ ability to refer appropriate patients to authorized treatment centers.
There is a need for education and training to be directed to community oncology practices.
SOLUTION
Gaps in community oncologists’ understanding of:
- Clinical credibility
- An ability to relate given experience in similar roles
- Proficiency to engage in relevant peer-to-peer discussions
- Increased time with HCPs and higher level of receptivity
– On average, VMS Oncology Nurse Educators interact with 7.2 oncology HCPs/day vs. oncology sales rep average of 2.3/day - The ability to easily integrate with existing field teams while also filling an educational role
PROGRAM DESIGN
Multiple encounters and interactions over time
Discovery
- Understand patient profile and current treatments customer is using
- Map HCP educational needs
In-Service
- Appropriate patient profile
- Patient consultation
- Treatment process: before and after treatment care
- Patient discussion about therapy
Follow-Up (As Needed)
- Address new questions
- Refresh on education
- Introduce new content
- Educate new staff members
RESULTS
ENGAGEMENT AND SATISFACTION
High reach demonstrates the need for this education within the oncology space.
2,036
total HCP engagements in 3 months
41%
completed with high-priority targets as identified by the client
High satisfaction scores indicate that HCPs value the education and support being provided by Oncology Nurse Educators.

TOPICS AND ATTENDEES
Treatment options, patient profile, and treatment were the top 3 topics discussed.
In-Service Topics Discussed (%)
The distribution of attendees was inclusive of nurses, physicians, and office staff.
Attendee Type – All Engagements (%)
RESULTS: PRE/POST KNOWLEDGE AND CONFIDENCE
Pre/post survey results demonstrate a high level of impact with a
192% increase in knowledge about therapy after an engagement.
